Clinical content. Reviewed. Sourced. Owned.
Security protects the data. Clinical governance protects the reasoning. Here is how the clinical content inside OnDemand Psychiatry is built, reviewed, and updated.
Who owns the clinical content.
Every reasoning pathway is built against a defined source set.
- DSM-5-TR (current edition)
- FDA labeling and current safety communications
- APA, AACAP, NICE, and CANMAT clinical guidelines (most recent versions)
- Peer-reviewed psychopharmacology literature (PubMed-indexed)
- Validated clinical instruments: SAFE-T, C-SSRS, HCR-20, MoCA, AUDIT, COWS, CIWA-Ar
- 100,000+ real psychiatric encounters reflecting Dr. Padder’s 25+ year career, used to inform reasoning frameworks, not to train external models
How often we review.
When something is wrong.
Clinicians can flag any output directly from the product. Every flag is triaged within two business days, and verified errors are corrected within five business days. Severity-1 safety issues are addressed immediately, with notice sent to active users.
Conflicts of interest & funding.
Dr. Padder publishes disclosures of any pharmaceutical, device, or commercial relationships annually. The clinical content team has no industry funding tied to product recommendations. OnDemand Psychiatry does not accept advertising or sponsored content from pharmaceutical or device manufacturers.
The 100,000-encounter framework.
The figure refers to Dr. Padder’s career clinical encounters across emergency, inpatient, outpatient, addiction, and consultation-liaison psychiatry. These encounters informed the design of the reasoning frameworks. They are not a training corpus for an external model and do not contain identifiable patient information. The system does not retrieve or surface any individual encounter.